• bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    vor 2 Tagen

    I was just using it as an example because a computer can replicate it exactly (its not oil on canvas, let’s be honest, some things are different skills than others)

    If it can replicate it perfectly it won’t be spotted. I guarantee ai is used in every new (big name)movie today and people can’t spot it.

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        vor 2 Tagen

        Yes, but 98% of the world experiences art (music and visual) all digitally. Thats why it sucks so hard that bot slop poisoned everything.

        When did you last see a kid slap on a reel to reel? They dont even know what CDs are now (which are obv digital but at least physical).

        Unless youre going to hand made art shows and buying cassettes at local shows of bands. So that’s what, 34 people out of 7 billion? 🫠

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          vor 1 Tag

          What a shit take. People interact with art way more in person than you’re giving credit for. Plus there’s entire art mediums that can’t be experienced digitally. Ceramics, fiber arts, sewing, fireworks, cooking, just off the top of my head. Seeing a painting IRL is a very different experience than online. Reading a physical book even hits different.

          And again, the point isn’t the end result. The point is making it. If people didn’t want to make art there would be no craft supply stores, no one would buy instruments and learn to play, people wouldn’t bother.

          Saying “oh we should give up” is ignoring that people want to make and decorate stuff.