• Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s really wild that the main characters had the weird habit of ending up in aerial combat every week as civilians.

      Not once in my 43 years have I felt the need to ascend in my battle helicopter to save the day.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Then the 90s rolled around and we got amazing shows like Viper and Thunder in Paradise instead.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fucking christ I’m glad I don’t live in the 80s…

        They call it in, and Murphy decides to show Lymangood something interesting. They fly over to nearby Encino, which is outside their patrol area. At 9:30PM, Lymangood is able to observe a very flexible young woman doing some amazing yoga moves in the nude. Unfortunately, they are interrupted. That “abandoned car” they spotted earlier was not abandoned.

        • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dude, that would 100% happen when you give cops surveillance tools. Not showing that in movies is actually less realistic.

          80s movies were so much more sexploitative. But this scene is just accurate.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I wonder how much of that behavior is because it was viewed as acceptable behavior through things like its portrayal in this movie? “Media shapes culture shapes media” is an argument, but “it’s realistic” falls a bit flat as a reason to perpetuate normalizing the behavior since clearly society has shifted away from that kind of representation of casual sexual harassment as being acceptable.

            • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s about how you show it. If it’s clear from the film that the behavior is not OK, I think it’s fine to show things that are absolutely happening in the real world. We get films and shows where cops murder people, steal drugs, whatever. And that’s certainly not normalizing this behavior. Not showing it is, in my mind, sweeping the well-documented asocial, asshole behavior of many cops under the carpet. Copaganda, essentially.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                society has shifted away from that kind of representation of casual sexual harassment as being acceptable.

                I think we agree? My point is that this movie does not depict it in a negative light, which is gross. Showing it because it’s ‘realistic’ is likely self-fufilling, showing it as commentary is very different from how sexploitation films usually operate.