• NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s entirely possible that the geniuses in charge of DHS had a totally insecure master admin password and security policy that allowed access to Okta management. The front door lock can still be called “secure” if the owner just left the back door open.

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        if okta has a halfway decent IT department, they’d be able to find that. it’d be the one non-DHS IP address in their access logs.

      • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        So someone with a master password was phished. That doesn’t really make it insecure. Someone had admin rights and they were stupid enough to be phished.

        You can’t fix stupid

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You can’t fix stupid, but you can build systems to help mitigate it. Rate limiting, alarms/pattern monitoring etc. unsurprisingly the fascists are too stupid to do any of that, even with their infinite corrupt budget.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The front door lock can still be called “secure” if the owner just left the back door open.

        That’d not even a back door. That’s just them leaving the key to the front door under a doormat.

      • morriscox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        True. When I was a network administrator I didn’t consider my network to be secure and I don’t trust my home network to be. I do what is feasible and hope that things work out.