My point was more that I’m like 99.9999999% sure that wasn’t the intent. Not everything is a conspiracy.
Edit: thanks for calling me stupid, that’s super classy. Two things. You heavily implied it, you even said it’s propaganda, which requires intent. Also, this is a shitpost community. We cool?
I also doubt it was his intent, but “accidentally pro-eugenics” is still “pro-eugenics.”
It’s a funny movie that’s easy to draw comparisons to as far as how brazenly stupid things have become, but it has always bothered me when people call it “prophetic,” as it implicitly accepts some deeply flawed aspects of its premise.
Hundreds of people participated in the production of that film. Maybe thousands. Because it’s a film. It takes a big social collective effort.
I would say that if you have a society that produces a feature length film whose basic premise is deeply eugenic and could plausibly be mistaken for intentionally-produced pro-eugenics propaganda, that you have a society deeply steeped in eugenics as a concept, maybe even moreso than one which would intentionally produce such a film as propaganda.
As someone else said: the purpose of the thing is to do what it does.
This is the same society in which millions of people voted Republican because they thought Trump was an honest and genius businessman, and was going to end all wars and make everyone rich.
You can’t imagine how hundreds of people there wouldn’t catch or care about a flawed minor presence of a niche concern in a low budget comedy movie?
It’s not even “deeply” eugenic. The movie isn’t about those themes at all. It’s a minor part of the setup to the world and doesn’t matter otherwise. Like the person above said, is 101 level stuff. The kind of stuff that gets referenced or used accidentally. This isn’t something like Birth of a Nation or Atlas Shrugged in terms of purposefully rationalizing a specific worldview.
The purpose of a system is what it does. This is based on the observation that systems can be changed by those with the power if what it is doing is unsatisfactory to those with the power.
That doesn’t apply to all things. The purpose of my cat wasn’t to puke on my carpet. That was just something I unfortunately had to deal with.
Propaganda doesn’t have to be convincing to be propaganda. When people are saying we live in Idiocracy, it’s not a very far leap to say that we need policies in place to direct the growth of the human population. That idea is eugenics.
Propaganda doesn’t have to be convincing to be propaganda
True, but it has to deliberately TRY to be convincing. Otherwise it’s by definition not propaganda.
When people are saying we live in Idiocracy, it’s not a very far leap to say that we need policies in place to direct the growth of the human population.
To the people that only know eugenics as “the thing Nazis believed”, then it is. The way neonazis onboard people is by asking questions such as “don’t you think we should try to eliminate this horrible genetic disease?”
It’s the same premise.
Edit: actually, I had forgotten. The pseudoscientist inventor of eugenics, Francis Galton, specifically sought to make the human population smarter.
My point was more that I’m like 99.9999999% sure that wasn’t the intent. Not everything is a conspiracy.
Edit: thanks for calling me stupid, that’s super classy. Two things. You heavily implied it, you even said it’s propaganda, which requires intent. Also, this is a shitpost community. We cool?
I also doubt it was his intent, but “accidentally pro-eugenics” is still “pro-eugenics.”
It’s a funny movie that’s easy to draw comparisons to as far as how brazenly stupid things have become, but it has always bothered me when people call it “prophetic,” as it implicitly accepts some deeply flawed aspects of its premise.
The term “propaganda” was used. That requires intent.
Hundreds of people participated in the production of that film. Maybe thousands. Because it’s a film. It takes a big social collective effort.
I would say that if you have a society that produces a feature length film whose basic premise is deeply eugenic and could plausibly be mistaken for intentionally-produced pro-eugenics propaganda, that you have a society deeply steeped in eugenics as a concept, maybe even moreso than one which would intentionally produce such a film as propaganda.
As someone else said: the purpose of the thing is to do what it does.
This is the same society in which millions of people voted Republican because they thought Trump was an honest and genius businessman, and was going to end all wars and make everyone rich.
You can’t imagine how hundreds of people there wouldn’t catch or care about a flawed minor presence of a niche concern in a low budget comedy movie?
It’s not even “deeply” eugenic. The movie isn’t about those themes at all. It’s a minor part of the setup to the world and doesn’t matter otherwise. Like the person above said, is 101 level stuff. The kind of stuff that gets referenced or used accidentally. This isn’t something like Birth of a Nation or Atlas Shrugged in terms of purposefully rationalizing a specific worldview.
deleted by creator
The purpose of a thing is what it does
The purpose of a system is what it does. This is based on the observation that systems can be changed by those with the power if what it is doing is unsatisfactory to those with the power.
That doesn’t apply to all things. The purpose of my cat wasn’t to puke on my carpet. That was just something I unfortunately had to deal with.
How many people has Idiocracy convinced that eugenics is the way forward?
Propaganda doesn’t have to be convincing to be propaganda. When people are saying we live in Idiocracy, it’s not a very far leap to say that we need policies in place to direct the growth of the human population. That idea is eugenics.
I’m talking about something’s purpose being what it does. If it doesn’t do that thing, then that can’t be its purpose.
So how many people is the movie influencing about eugenics and come out of it with such strong opinions?
True, but it has to deliberately TRY to be convincing. Otherwise it’s by definition not propaganda.
The fuck it isn’t! 🤦🏻
To the people that only know eugenics as “the thing Nazis believed”, then it is. The way neonazis onboard people is by asking questions such as “don’t you think we should try to eliminate this horrible genetic disease?”
It’s the same premise.
Edit: actually, I had forgotten. The pseudoscientist inventor of eugenics, Francis Galton, specifically sought to make the human population smarter.
Again, I never mentioned any conspiracy. You’re reading things into my comment that aren’t there. His intent has no real bearing on the matter.