Epzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agono one can understand AIlemmy.worldimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1484arrow-down129 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1455arrow-down1imageno one can understand AIlemmy.worldEpzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square40fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEpzillon@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down3·17 days agoYes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
minus-squareweps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down1·17 days ago98% accurate prime checker, super fast isPrime() return False;
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·17 days agoA transistor is on or off. It’s all if-then.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-217 days agoNo, it’s more elemental: it’s all ands , ors and nots
minus-squarenop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·17 days agoBoolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
98% accurate prime checker, super fast
isPrime() return False;
A transistor is on or off. It’s all if-then.
No, it’s more elemental: it’s all ands , ors and nots
Boolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.