https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/986176/data-center-pollution-epa-rule-change-air-permit

This month, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued guidance clarifying that the Clean Air Act (CAA) Acid Rain Program(ARP) does not apply to power generation facilities that are not connected to a public electricity grid , commonly referred to as “islanded” power generation facilities.

The guidance expands opportunities for companies to develop and operate islanded power generation facilities for data centers

“Ensuring that the United States maintains our artificial intelligence dominance is essential to national security and economic prosperity. At the same time, it is equally important that we safeguard our communities from utility price hikes” said EPA Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Aaron Szabo

https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-issues-permitting-guidance-further-president-trumps-agenda-promoting-data-centers

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wonder if there’s any connection between this and the billionaires sharing the stage with Trump’s victory party?

    Nah, they were just patriotic

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    is this for all industry? huge if true

    I know I know data centers blablabla but that’s nothing compared to energy intensive industry

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      that’s nothing compared to energy intensive industry

      Sounds pretty comparable to me actually. A large aluminium smelter uses 1.25 GW. Colossus II is estimated to be at the 950 MW IT load level by now. Add to that 20% to 30% of power overhead for cooling and you’re getting squarely in the same ballpark.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whether it is possible or not, we’re not going to get to AGI levels because we’re going to kill each other first. It was just a matter of time. Atomic bombs paused us a bit, but then we got smart and figured other ways to ruin everything.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        LLMs were one part of AI research. They basically threw everything else down when they realized the profits. I’m sure other AGI stuff is still going on, but I don’t think it’s from these companies.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          What profits? They are not even breaking even yet, and it seems people don’t want to pay for what this shit actually costs.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, profits is a misleading word. Investments? Lots of money is being thrown around. Is it real? shrug

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          From what I’ve heard, AI execs screamed at the engineers until all those who thought we need more advanced models instead of “superscaling” left or shut their mouths.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Now that all the LLM companies are hoarding all the graphics cards and memory though it’s probably going to be harder/more expensive for people exploring other avenues =(

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not possible the way they’re trying to do it, no question.

      You could make a flimsy argument that it would be possible in some way, but the way that they’ve chosen to approach it is 100% not viable.

  • rockettaco37@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    The EPA has never been useful. I grew up in Western NY and Love Canal are words we haven’t forgotten.

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is just plain stupid. It could of course be better (when all those idiots in the idiocracy of the USA wouldn’t elect these stupid Nazis), but not even having it at the first place or monitoring all these issues? This development in the USA is really just extremely depressing.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So the EPA, which was first founded in December 1970, is responsible for Love Canal and not Hooker Chemical? You mean the problem that came to attention in 1977, was declared as a federal disaster in 1978, and was the first ever Superfund site? That useless EPA?

      If the EPA didn’t exist, Hooker Chemical wouldn’t have dumped their toxic waste there… 50+ years prior, those wacky time travelers, am I right?

      Do you also call firefighters useless when they aren’t able to extinguish a fire in time?

      • rockettaco37@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The only reason Superfund was established in the first place is because people like Lois Gibbs and the LCHA had to beg for it. The government had very much turned a blind eye to the initial disaster until people got loud about it.

        So unless the whole city basically has to collectively shout outside the fire department every time there’s a fire while most of their home have already burnt down, I can’t say that I do agree with your analogy.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yes, the government, not the EPA. The EPA didn’t have the funding nor legal mandate to tackle such a problem when it was first discovered. It doesn’t justify calling them useless.

      • rockettaco37@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Or just not ignorant to history.

        Look up the PBS documentary Poisioned Ground

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I’ve heard every propaganda narrative a hundred times before, traitor.

          “Workers were better off before health and safety regulations”

          “The slaves were happier before they were freed”

          The solution to the failure of safeguards isn’t to destroy the safeguards, but your mental illness is not based on logic. It’s based on propaganda.

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Lol “just not ignorant” meanwhile other comments have proven you don’t even have a basic understanding of what happened. Go look at how the vast majority of the country looked before the EPA.