• OilyArena@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s so easy to hide a little switch to toggle “bike legal mode” on many models, in my experience that doesn’t really stop people, sadly.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It should be pretty easy to tell by the type of motor it has. An e-bike with a low-watt motor isn’t going to suddenly become a menace by flipping a fancy switch.

      Likewise if a bike has a motor capable of pulling 35 mph or whatever, then it doesn’t matter if they can turn a governor on to keep it below 25 mph. It’s still got the more powerful motor and will be classified as such

      • OilyArena@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not really, a 250W (average, not peak!) motor can exceed 25km/h easily on flat ground, the only difference to a stronger motor would be the acceleration.

        Disabling the electronic limit is the issue.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Well, not “easily”. I think we can agree that all else being equal pedestrian outcomes are better when motors are 250W than 600W, whether or not limited. I think it’s totally reasonable to restrict unlicensed riders to motors with power output within normal human capacity, like 100-200W.

          • OilyArena@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            afaik, those numbers just don’t tell you a whole lot about the actual power of the motor. A “250W motor” could produce peak power output of 1kW during short bursts, as long as the average power over a longer time is at or below 250W, they’re fully legal.