They are all some binary file that completes a task. That LLMs have a statistically derived “personality” (if one would be dangerous enough to call it that) to make people like them was a purposeful mistake in development to trick people into embracing the technology. LLM is non-deterministic by nature which means results can never be trusted.
Honestly, the Photoshop filter analogy may be wrong because the filter is deterministic. The same settings produce the same results every time as it is math on an image file. LLMs literally can’t do that.
LLM tech is only seeing more “reliable” results now as they often throw the tool against a sandbox environment where it has to execute deterministic code to compensate for the random unreliability, and it still screws up.
Linus knows code, the tool sped up his process. In the absence of his knowledge, it would be useless.
Neat toy, but way too inefficient to bank the future on, and very dangerous to have such a religious reaction to.
No. That’s… That’s completely wrong.
It is amazing how y’all don’t know how any of this tech works.
Linus Torvalds used it to fix some code but it’s like a Photoshop filter? Come on man… You can’t be that intentionally ignorant.
Go do some research. Jesus.
Look I’m not some kind of supporter or fan boy but even I know how utterly reductive and incorrect what you said is.
They are all some binary file that completes a task. That LLMs have a statistically derived “personality” (if one would be dangerous enough to call it that) to make people like them was a purposeful mistake in development to trick people into embracing the technology. LLM is non-deterministic by nature which means results can never be trusted.
Honestly, the Photoshop filter analogy may be wrong because the filter is deterministic. The same settings produce the same results every time as it is math on an image file. LLMs literally can’t do that.
LLM tech is only seeing more “reliable” results now as they often throw the tool against a sandbox environment where it has to execute deterministic code to compensate for the random unreliability, and it still screws up.
Linus knows code, the tool sped up his process. In the absence of his knowledge, it would be useless.
Neat toy, but way too inefficient to bank the future on, and very dangerous to have such a religious reaction to.
You clearly don’t understand what an analogy is.
Maybe if you’d stop using AI for all mental activities you’d fucking understand that
What you said isn’t an analogy… What?