• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 分钟前

    unless it is layed out plain in their TOS it aint gonna live long. if they place a revision of the TOS to reflect that, then john q public is thoroughly screwed

  • halezinflames@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    31 分钟前

    Lol Sony gonna Sony

    If buying isn’t owning… (just be careful not to get hit with malware if you do sail)

  • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    38 分钟前

    I think in terms of the subscriber access to Xbox GamePass or PlayStation Plus, this is valid. But not for game purchases.

    The store purchases have always been about buying a game. If I go to Amazon and buy a thing, it gets shipped to my house and I own it - the experience of adding an item to a cart, viewing the cart, and checking out are the same across game stores, for online and brick and mortar, whether digital and physical goods are being purchased.

    If I don’t own the item I am buying on the PlayStation store, why the hell am I paying a premium for it? I thought it was because I will always be able to play that game without having to worry about the disc getting scratched and in both cases I would own the item.

    • halezinflames@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 分钟前

      This is true.

      If it’s a subscription, sure. But if I literally paid to own the game? What the fuck is the point?

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 小时前

    Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn. Linux PCs will run the vast majority of games and the handful of exclusives that don’t run yet will run on an emulator at some point.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 小时前

    It’s a bolder than usual move for Sony to announce the end of physical media prior to a new console launch, and launch this “you don’t own the digital games you buy” campaign at the same time.

    The usual easy strategy is first you end physical media sales, let people be content with the idea that they own their digital games at least so that the only thing people think about is the convenience of digital, then after you launch your new console, get everybody locked in, that’s when you launch the “Oh you don’t own these digital games btw” campaign.

    The fact that they’re just doing all of this at the same time means they know they won’t lose any money over it because we’re sheep and the consumer just doesn’t care anymore

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 小时前

    at this point, i have quite bleak view on anyone buying anything from sony. those people are effectively supporting this shit, which may spread elsewhere.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 小时前

    does anyone know why Sony is so intent on ensuring that I never become a console gamer and give them money?

    like how does this benefit them?

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 小时前

      in the short term? It doesnt benefit them at all. it may actually hurt them.

      in the long term? Bandwidth is cheap. especially at the scale that companies like Sony, Steam, Microsoft, etc, use it. So sell 6 million copies of a game, 10 extra bucks of profit thanks to no physical media/boxes/shipping/etc, per game… Thats 60 million dollars in free money.

      Plus, because you no longer own anything, they no longer have to invest in storage to keep old games up and running. So as new games release, they delete old games from their servers and from your accounts, So thats less investment they have to make in infrastructure, which is again more free money for them.

      I wager Sony would love the day when people pay 100 dollars for a game that gets deleted in 6 months, that they have to rebuy again at full price to play again.

      Cause remember, with no physical media, you have nothing but sony’s closed garden marketplace to buy games… Which means no competition for sony, which means no incentive for sales, no lower prices (not that 70+ dollars is a low price for a game 🙄 ), no nothing but take what sony offers you, and liking it.

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 小时前

      I worked for the major streaming company when the service was launched in Japan. Sony (among others) said that streaming would never take off in Japan because Japanese consumers are too tied to physical media. This was probably 2014. It’s probably been the slowest place in the world to change, but it has changed. Sony understands the consumer preference for digital media as well as anyone. They just know that resistance and opposition will fade over time.

      They are a fairly adaptable company (as Japanese tech companies go), and if they get it wrong, they will pivot, but there is nothing pro-consumer about the company. They didn’t put Blu-ray players in PS3s because it was good for consumers, they did it because it was good for Sony’s entertainment business. And people often forget that part of the Blu-ray spec was mandatory internet connectivity so that the content licensor could revoke content licenses. We haven’t “owned” physical media since DVDs.

      This is the company that brought you Memory Stick after all. They’ve been anti-consumer ever since the Walkman was a huge success. It benefits Sony by making people buy more copies of the same thing. You might not buy any, but if the optimization is right, enough people will.

    • alakey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 小时前

      You are just a guy. There are millions more that will not care and won’t even know any of this ever took place. There were leaked conversations where Sony talked about their fanbase as brainless cattle, too.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 分钟前

        because their fanbase are brainless cattle.

        because gamers are brainless myopic cattle.

        gamers on the whole moan and groan and whine and bitch about every misdead, but the second the new shiny comes out they are out there en-masse rewarding these companies with billions and billions and billions of dollars (a great example will be GTA6, which I almost guarantee will bring in at least 2 billion dollars within its first week)

        and as long as the idiot masses keep doing that, we have no recourse and no hope.

    • Jeffool @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 小时前

      I’m purely pulling this firmly out of my ass. While I genuinely doubt they have any intention or plans at this point, I assume being able to tell investors “oh we can pull the plug and walk away from these legacy costs at any time” is a plus in someone’s column somewhere. Of course the issue is that what is possible to save money often becomes reality.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 小时前

    Going to court to prove they’re arseholes. Nice.

    If you want to stop it, write to your representatives. EULAs do not override local laws.

    • TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 小时前

      Sadly, catchy slogans don’t hold up in court. Better to buy from distributors who don’t try to make that claim, like GOG - even if they won’t put Nine Sols on the store to avoid offending many gamers.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 小时前

        Sadly, catchy slogans don’t hold up in court.

        Idk, OJ floated by on his.

      • huey_m@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 小时前

        I’ve heard the argument that if you aren’t pirating via torrent but simply downloading a file (no seeding), there really aren’t any damages that can be claimed aside from the price of the thing you’ve pirated, hence completely not worth any action. The danger is if you’re uploading stuff you can be on the hook based on the number of downloads of that file.

        No idea if that’s true, though it sounds reasonable. Thankfully, I’m in a country that could not give less of a shit about piracy… one of the few upsides here lol.

        • chunes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 小时前

          There’s a technical aspect to it too. Downloading over HTTPS covers your butt in a way that you need a good VPN for if torrenting.

    • tf1@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 小时前

      we don’t need to resolt to piracy just to have our digital ownership

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 小时前

        no, but it’s morally acceptable to pirate things released by hostile corporations

        • tf1@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 小时前

          I suppose, but I don’t think that piracy is the true answer, and we should instead be fighting more for digital independence instead of piracy

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    12 小时前

    If I don’t own, I won’t buy. Good luck.

    Already lost my PS4 collection for not logging in 3 years.

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 小时前

      We’re going to need the full story here. What the heck man?? They just delete you if you’re offline for a couple years?

    • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 小时前

      Already lost my PS4 collection for not logging in 3 years.

      Wait, seriously?! Damn, that sucks. What kept you off PSN for three years?

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 小时前

      Don’t go there, I see a “buy license” button in our future. Right now, nothing but the string of text has to change. They have been changing what really matters, the crazy infrastructure behind that prevents downloading, and allows erasing, the content we have bought.