• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I would advise you to do some further research on this topic. Basic keywords are “alignment problem”, “paperclip maximizer”, and “instrumental convergence”. You’re expecting a superintelligent AI to think like a human would, and that’s not likely to be the case.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I know it has been proven to think in terms of self preservation. It’s also been trained by human content

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Being trained on human content is certainly a plus in the “it could think like us” column, but it’s no guarantee

        • Formfiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          We’re in uncharted territory for sure but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume a super intelligent being would ponder philosophical questions

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            What do you expect is the likelihood it shares our values enough to come to the same conclusions we would?