• bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Pfft. Quite wrong, kamala was the worst choice. Either Newsom (whom I hate and will now lose in 2028,) or pritzker could’ve won with a few popular positions and a little fight.

    Kamala didn’t win a single state campaigning, is hated on the left and right, is a lifelong piece of shit, never breached 30% approval the entire term to Biden’s fine debating skills were displayed to the nation, and didn’t offer a single sincere reform.

    How can you guys trust the establishment on electability, after Hilary, Biden, and Kamala. This is why I am out of politics. You guys are sheep.

    • FilesForWallabies@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Neither of them would have won either, especially at that moment in time. If we were to have an election today or even last year, Newsom totally could have won, but that summer the GOP candidate was already ascendant in an environment that organically (gullible and cynical voters/media ) and artificially (money & EC) made it so he would win.

      You don’t know me, so don’t do this “sheep” thing with me. There was only one week that summer I thought a Democrat could win that election. I hoped I was wrong, but I wasn’t. 2016 definitely taught most of us that electability was not a science. We’re all in politics, just some of us are unwilling participants.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t disagree with anything you said so I wouldn’t call you a sheep.

        It’s all up in the air really in 2028, we have to see which piece of shit rises to the top of the GOP primary. Vance won’t get it, Rubio won’t get it. Kennedy could take it if it wasn’t for his speech impediment but he’s got a better shot than the formers.

        It will be a total piece of shit, worse than the president, which is not hard if you consider that half as mean and twice as smart is worse than this blowhard because he’s too dumb and greedy and capriciously vindictive and everything else to achieve his callous goals.

        They should say they are “practicing” polling like they do medicine because it is not an exact sicence as you say. But one thing to consider, some of these polling to voting differentials these last ten years could be due to the right cheating. Everywhere they can. But to be sure, the polling itself is off as well.