• NotSafeForWorld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I agree that this is a pretty skewed definition of culture. It undermines everything that’s happened since (and is continuing to happen everyday). Every time someone tries a new cuisine, gets invited to a new festival, learns something new about history, learns a new language, etc. is adding to the culture

    • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      You are exactly correct. Constructive acts build culture. Building bridges between cultures leads to fusions of art and cuisine that beget even more culture.

      Colonizers are the opposite of constructive. They are destructive. Colonizers invade, exploit, ostracize, and take. They subtract. You cannot build a stable culture on subtraction.

      Canadians get the worst of both worlds. Not only did they invade and desecrate, they decided to adopt two colonizer cultures and name it their own. Two negatives do not make a positive here. Reparation and recognition laws are barely middle age by people standards and they’re already being ignored. Forgotten. Disregarded as inconvenient. None of them can smell the earth over their unending greed for the dollar.