• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Well, they’re not offering you cheap compute because they have a big heart or because they like you soo much on a personal level. They also follow some goal. And you’re probably contributing towards it.

    But it’s super difficult to judge because the AI industry is so convoluted and ridiculous. I also don’t see a good way to deal with it. Pick your poison. Best course of action is probably not to do poison at all… But you probably know as much. And the enemy of your enemy isn’t always your friend.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Oh, of course. I mean, it’s an AI race, the more users you have, the better.

      But you are right that I have not considered that it could be contributing to the attrocities China is doing domestically, especially with how is their social credit thing going (if that’s still a thing, haven’t really checked on it for decade at this point), adding a good AI to the mix is dreadful to think about.

      Soo, yeah. From a strictly selfish point of view, it’s probably better to send your personal data to china, assuming you’re not likely to visit. That is assuming they are not selling their data to the US brokers, but it feels unlikely they’d be allowed to. The cost, however, is you’re helping with enabling a regime with keeping their citizens in line.

      On the other hand, US providers are the same, the regime just didn’t have a headstart to have the oppression infrastructure already in place. So, yeah. The only winning move is not to play (or just have a local model).

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I somehow doubt that’s their goal. While a surveillance dystopia needs some image recognition and advanced algorithms and machine learning, I don’t think it needs chatbots and large language models for programming nearly as much as they implement. It’s probably part of the equation. But I don’t think that’s nearly close to the entire reason why they do what they do. There’s probably way more to it if you ask me.

        And we’re about to find out about the local models… Mind those are mostly designed by big tech companies or Chinese startups as well. Again not necessarily driven by benevolence.