• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    “A lot less” is something I’d like to have a source for, especially as the switch to SUVs and trucks is done to a large part to evade the much stricter emission norms for officially classified “cars”. Emissions could be a lot lower if the SUV loophole for many of the car norms had not been invented.

    • inverted_deflector@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      SUVs are still popular and large trucks are just awful. It’s a big problem in this country. But most of the cars sold aren’t actual SUVs. They’re CUVs. They’re built on car chassis. They are heavier, which means they get worse fuel economy than their car equivalent. And they’re less aerodynamic, which means they get less fuel economy than their car equivalent. And that weight means they also erode their tires faster, which of course is just worse for the environment as well as well as their brakes and other components.

      That said, the difference in size compared to their sedan equivalent, or even hatchback, five-door equivalent, is not tremendous. Even efficiency, the loss is usually maybe like a couple of miles per gallon on the tests. Though I imagine if you try to hyper mile and you know baby is a throttle you can get more out of the car-shaped vehicle than you can the fake SUV/CUV shaped vehicle.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        Pedestrian safety, especially for children, is however much worse, luckily no one cares about that in safety tests in the US. In Europe you get downgraded for it.