It also doesn’t mention the amount of methane that cows produce either, which is insanely disproportionate and is destroying our climate. I’ll continue using AI all I want as long as those who complain about AI continue eating beef, while I myself do not eat beef, because the benefit gained from using AI far outweighs the benefit of eating beef. So it pays for itself more than enough.
It also doesn’t mention the amount of methane that cows produce either, which is insanely disproportionate and is destroying our climate. I’ll continue using AI all I want as long as those who complain about AI continue eating beef, while I myself do not eat beef, because the benefit gained from using AI far outweighs the benefit of eating beef. So it pays for itself more than enough.
Are these benefits in the room with us right now?
Removed by mod
Hello concern troll!
This is one insane take. If you recognize that both are bad, why do choose between one or the other?
They always tell on themselves.
Here’s an idea: no beef and no chatbots
Do the boots really taste so good as to completely lose any sense of self preservation in a vain attempt to proselytize sane and cognizant people?