What? Now you’re combining 1) what would be the current race/appointment (because that’s debated) if McConnell was declared dead before Aug 3, and 2) the upcoming race in the midterms. That’s whole point of this shenanigan, the GOP doesn’t want race/appointment #1.
Ok rereading this I think you missed the whole shenanigan the last few weeks. If McConnel is declared dead before Aug 3, then there is a special election/appointment. If McConnel is declared dead after Aug 3, then there is a rule that kicks in that because it’s only 3 months until the midterms, then there is no special election/appointment and McConnells seat election gets rolled up together with the midterms.
They want to keep McConnell on life support until aug 3 because then there is no special election/appointment and it gets punted to the midterms race #2. Their thought process is that if Massie wins/is appointed in race #1, that will give him the “incumbent” advantage in race #2. Incumbent in scare quotes if you want.
Their thought process is that if Massie wins/is appointed, then it will give him an “incumbent” advantage in the midterms
But I don’t believe Massie can run in the midterms.
I admit I am wrong that he can’t be the incumbent, because technically being the incumbent just implies holding the office, not running for the office they currently hold, but in a world where a special election happens (or an appointment), and Massie takes McConnell’s Senate seat, he can not run in the midterm election.
Per Ballotpedia the deadline to file as a unaffiliated (independent) was in June.
Any special election would only cover the remainder of McConnell’s term and not the term after, which is a whole separate election that is happening in November.
My guess, after reading more about it, would be that a special election could include the two current midterm candidates AND Massie (as an independent), and that election could result in a Democrat winning. Then because the Democrats “just won” it would lower Republican voter turnout in the midterms. (Although I suspect in this scenario the midterm and special election would both take place in November, so it wouldn’t be two separate elections, but Massie would get more air time to ensure the Republican doesn’t win.)
What? Now you’re combining 1) what would be the current race/appointment (because that’s debated) if McConnell was declared dead before Aug 3, and 2) the upcoming race in the midterms. That’s whole point of this shenanigan, the GOP doesn’t want race/appointment #1.
Ok rereading this I think you missed the whole shenanigan the last few weeks. If McConnel is declared dead before Aug 3, then there is a special election/appointment. If McConnel is declared dead after Aug 3, then there is a rule that kicks in that because it’s only 3 months until the midterms, then there is no special election/appointment and McConnells seat election gets rolled up together with the midterms.
They want to keep McConnell on life support until aug 3 because then there is no special election/appointment and it gets punted to the midterms race #2. Their thought process is that if Massie wins/is appointed in race #1, that will give him the “incumbent” advantage in race #2. Incumbent in scare quotes if you want.
So I don’t think I’ve missed it.
As you said,
But I don’t believe Massie can run in the midterms.
I admit I am wrong that he can’t be the incumbent, because technically being the incumbent just implies holding the office, not running for the office they currently hold, but in a world where a special election happens (or an appointment), and Massie takes McConnell’s Senate seat, he can not run in the midterm election.
Per Ballotpedia the deadline to file as a unaffiliated (independent) was in June.
Any special election would only cover the remainder of McConnell’s term and not the term after, which is a whole separate election that is happening in November.
My guess, after reading more about it, would be that a special election could include the two current midterm candidates AND Massie (as an independent), and that election could result in a Democrat winning. Then because the Democrats “just won” it would lower Republican voter turnout in the midterms. (Although I suspect in this scenario the midterm and special election would both take place in November, so it wouldn’t be two separate elections, but Massie would get more air time to ensure the Republican doesn’t win.)