I’m not as anti-AI as the rest of this place but I am 100% in favor of being honest about it.

I found a mod passing off AI generated images as authentic, vintage sci-fi covers. I asked why they were mixing them together and was not only banned but they deleted my comment.

  • PragmaticOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    So what you’re saying is that @[email protected] is a dishonest individual?

    Cool, fucker is now blocked.

    AI has a place but the majority do not know how to use to correctly. Their ignorance is the problem hence they are a problem. :/

    • python@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Personally, AI slop posters get a tag instead of a block from me so that I can downvote/comment whenever I come across their content.

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      No, they aren’t a dishonest individual.

      They are posting AI to an instance where AI is allowed. Nothing dishonest about it.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 days ago

        AI being allowed is one thing. If a community wants to allow it then that’s their business, I don’t care.

        AI being unlabeled is quite another and misleading at best. Again, a community may choose to not have this requirement, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s misleading.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        I do think that unlabeled AI on a federated platform is a little irresponsible, even though the community embraces it. It’s not about the rules, it’s about whether viewers - many of whom won’t be subscribers to the community - are misled into thinking the publications are real.