This means he can be replaced with another Democrat

Per the NYT

Graham Platner can be replaced as the Democratic nominee for Senate in Maine if he withdraws from the race by next Monday, and state law would then give the state Democratic Party until July 27 to name a replacement.

    • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sure, another spineless establishment Dem. If the necessary voters even show up after Platner shit the bed for everyone.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There are at least three Democrats who poll well enough to stand a chance. I do not claim any insight into who will be chosen

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          The selection will be made by 600 delegates to a convention, 500 selected by the county committees and 100 for the state committee members. It’s entirely insider chosen.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              The RCV aspect of their primary would also be very valuable, since it sounds like there will be a lot of options and little time to coalesce.

      • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Don’t give a shit. Even if Platner had stayed on the ballot, (and I lived in Maine) I would have voted for him. He has the one quality I’m most looking for. Not republican.

          • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, if I had stayed home or pissed my vote away on a useless third party THEN I’d be one of the ones who got him elected. I voted.

              • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Right now, voting against MAGA is priority #1… once they’re fucking exterminated, we can concentrate our efforts on building a better party.

                So rule still applies. Vote furthest left in EVERY election, but vote in EVERY election.

                • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  While I don’t disagree with the need, what you’re saying sounds an awful lot like “We need to drain the swamp and so what if he grabbed them by the pussy or some shit? You gotta do what you gotta do.”

                  And I’m just still not down with that.

                  • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I see what you mean…but I’m more interested in the majority than the person right now… The only way we’re ever going to undo the damage is with the majority… I’m hoping that platner stepping down doesn’t kill that plan… And while I’m glad he’s stepped down, I think that a small win for decency might just cost us the ballgame…

                    There is no good way to fix this…there are only bad ways…but right now, I just want it fixed.