The more into get you it, the more expensive it gets. No those bikes and accessories aren’t cheap.
She’s ‘getting into it’ wrong.
My hot take of the day: Unless you’re making up for the cost of it by winning money at competitive events, you have no business even thinking about any bike that costs more than $600. And for the vast majority of people, $600 is the luxury option – a $200 used bike (with a bit of maintenance) will do everything you could ever ask it to.
Sincerely, someone who does most of his commuting on a $20 used bike from the 90’s. (It’s a great feeling of power, overtaking a $1500 ebike on your $20 steel frame 90’s cruiser.)
Everyone’s finances are different, your economic guardrails won’t necessarily make sense for someone else. I’ve built plenty of commuters that have rolled out the door of my local coop for < $50 and I put love into every single one of them, every single one of them was (Mostly) solid. But I also have a $3.5K dream build that mostly just hangs on my wall made from vintage new-on-shelf parts, an ode to late-90s / early-00s roadie aesthetics.
I do agree, but in her defense she is making full use of it and over time has progressed from the basic commuter to more advanced bikes which have had significant increase to speed and enjoyability/comfort of the ride. Up until now she has already rode 5k km just this year, planning to finish this year with 10k km.
For everyone else I do agree and have a basic commuter that I literally got from a trash pile through her connections to local biking community.
Yeah I would generally agree to that. I got mine for £600 and admit it’s more than I really needed. But it’s a pretty nice bike and I use it a lot. It was the cheaper model from the more expensive brand so my thinking was it’s probably a pretty good frame and I can replace other parts as I go.
Replaced the tyres after about 2 years, new ones cost like twice as much but marathon plus touring tyres should last far longer and are much more puncture resistant.
![[meme] Anon likes bikes](https://files.ikt.id.au/aqdemc.webp){kind=link}
She’s ‘getting into it’ wrong.
My hot take of the day: Unless you’re making up for the cost of it by winning money at competitive events, you have no business even thinking about any bike that costs more than $600. And for the vast majority of people, $600 is the luxury option – a $200 used bike (with a bit of maintenance) will do everything you could ever ask it to.
Sincerely, someone who does most of his commuting on a $20 used bike from the 90’s. (It’s a great feeling of power, overtaking a $1500 ebike on your $20 steel frame 90’s cruiser.)
Everyone’s finances are different, your economic guardrails won’t necessarily make sense for someone else. I’ve built plenty of commuters that have rolled out the door of my local coop for < $50 and I put love into every single one of them, every single one of them was (Mostly) solid. But I also have a $3.5K dream build that mostly just hangs on my wall made from vintage new-on-shelf parts, an ode to late-90s / early-00s roadie aesthetics.
I do agree, but in her defense she is making full use of it and over time has progressed from the basic commuter to more advanced bikes which have had significant increase to speed and enjoyability/comfort of the ride. Up until now she has already rode 5k km just this year, planning to finish this year with 10k km.
For everyone else I do agree and have a basic commuter that I literally got from a trash pile through her connections to local biking community.
Yeah I would generally agree to that. I got mine for £600 and admit it’s more than I really needed. But it’s a pretty nice bike and I use it a lot. It was the cheaper model from the more expensive brand so my thinking was it’s probably a pretty good frame and I can replace other parts as I go.
Replaced the tyres after about 2 years, new ones cost like twice as much but marathon plus touring tyres should last far longer and are much more puncture resistant.