• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    6 years is a terrible idea. It would allow even 1-term Presidents to select a majority of the justices and get whatever they want, and a 2-term President to appoint every seat.

    18 years is correct. It’s the shortest term that doesn’t allow a 2-term President to appoint a majority of the justices (resignationsand draths notwithstanding).

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You could be correct. It’s a good problem that could be presented to mathematicians. Find the smallest number that prevents a single President from appointing a majority of SCOTUS justices. Mathematicians would be permitted to change the number of justices. The problem with 18 is that a bad justice would serve a long time, but it might be the only solution.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        The number of justices isn’t the reason for 18 years. It’s the length of Presidential administrations. A single administration is normally limited to 8 years, so the length of the SCOTUS term has to be more than double that to prevent them from nominating half the justices.

        • panthera_@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          True, but it might be difficult to impose term limits because the Constitution says SCOTUS justices have lifetime appointments.