A Ford employee says he lost his job after being accused of stealing a $1.95 cookie, only for the company to later realize he’d actually paid for it.

60-year-old Kurt Kromm had worked at Ford’s Kentucky Truck Plant for 11 years, but told Shifting Gears he was fired after the company believed security footage showed him taking a cookie from the break room without paying.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 days ago

    At my last job they have a policy of people who retire are allowed to cash out Extended Illness Bank (EIB) hours at full hourly wages if you are over a certain age and have a certain number of years with the organization. The bank is maxed max out at 400 hours.

    One day I was in HR working for a reporting meeting. An employee who was less than a month from hitting the age/tenure threshold was being fired for a miniscule reason.

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yep. I remember having to temporarily sit at the desk of some department head to address a network problem, whose desk was covered in paperwork involving some poor custodian who was asking for a medically necessary limited period of light duty as a result of a work-related injury, and this director’s handwritten notes all over it, with shit like “if she can’t do the job she shouldn’t be here, let’s draw a line under this,” etc. It was clear exactly what they were getting at; they ALL knew the law, hence the handwritten notes and vague language. The casual nature of it was revolting.

        • kablez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          The corporate mentality. All the behaviours of a psychopath. None of the medical explanation.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Because high level corporate people are psychopaths.

            Statistically speaking, psychopathic traits/tendencies are very beneficial and actively selected for, for climbing the corporate ladder.

            Now, obviously, they don’t go “Hey, you’re a psychomath, lets promote you 3 rungs up”, its that psychopaths have the charisma, manipulation, can backstab without feeling guilt, etc necessary to lift themselves up while pushing others down.

            • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 days ago

              Or that ages of “wives tales” are actually true and wealth really does something to our psyche. It’s true to say that immoral people get into these positions and make the rules, but I think it’s overly simplistic to believe that is the entire reason.

              The more terrifying analysis is that people do change and not always for the better. The system is stupidly good at corrupting people and power/wealth do something to our monkey brains that is insanely antisocial. People unfortunately absolutely do become worse in the system, and it is designed that way.

              • kablez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                it is designed that way

                They say the fish rots from the head down, and the same applies to organisations. Rot sets in when leadership becomes obsessed with short term gains, prioritises optics over substance, and treats excellence as a performance rather than a standard to live up to.

                When you follow the money to the top, especially in publicly listed companies, it gets pretty grim. You see the same small circle of people rotating across boards, often lacking deep, tangible understanding of what they’re overseeing, appointed more for status and connections than competence.

                Meanwhile, the people who actually built and sustain the company, the ones whose livelihoods depend on it, barely factor into the equation. They’re seen as nothing more than furniture that gets passed along with a company acquisition. Culture flows from that reality. When leadership rewards self serving behaviour, people adapt accordingly.

                That’s how you end up with environments that feel psychopathic, not necessarily because individuals start that way, but because the system consistently selects for and reinforces it.

                My 2c anyway.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  My dude.

                  theres literally been studies about this.

                  Its because they start that way. Corporate environments are a fertile ground for psychopathic tendencies to produce results.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        At a previous job the general manager was trying to coach me on how to talk to people who had been hurt on the job, in an attempt to talk them out of going to the ER or urgnt care for treatment. I never had to do it, but my intent was to do the opposite of that if I was ever put in that situation. I can lie too, assholes.

        That company went out of business in 2024.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      sounds like the one in the article, and an another story i heard years back. a a stewardess was 60-70+yo in her airline job, and the airline accused her of stealing and fired her, she was earning 200k+/year plus other benefits, and she was on the verge or retiring. they knew what they were doing. they are probably figure people wouldnt notice and she would accept it, or they mightve calculated the potential lawsuit costs of firing her.(using this as a template to fire people before they even have a chance to sue).