As a longtime member of the 3D-printing community, I'm alarmed by new legislation targeting the digital files, platforms, and machines that create weapons. It raises a powerful question: Who decides what can be made?
I have faith that the independent 3D printing community will continue to hack its way around printer DRM.
I also have faith that printers that can be modified to print guns (or anything else too spicy for government) will sell better than printers that cannot.
I mean you can just build one. Presumably there’s bugger all they can do about Voron. Slicers are open source, firmware is open source, plans are open source and there are open source controllers.
I have faith that the independent 3D printing community will continue to hack its way around printer DRM.
I also have faith that printers that can be modified to print guns (or anything else too spicy for government) will sell better than printers that cannot.
I mean you can just build one. Presumably there’s bugger all they can do about Voron. Slicers are open source, firmware is open source, plans are open source and there are open source controllers.
Heh. Ghost printers.