The US Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Hawaii law requiring licensed permit holders to obtain a property owner's express permission before carrying a firearm onto private property open to the...
I don’t think it realy actually has much to do with guns. It’s about privacy. Something the Supreme Court has been trying to murder for the last 50 years.
Don’t get me wrong, I do see the gun owners arguments here. What’s wrong with putting up a sign? That’s a legitimate point. But the law itself and the Supreme Court challenge brings it into a different Realm. If the owner of a private domicile or business wants it to be different, they want to have individual decision making on a case-by-case basis, why shouldn’t they? It’s their private home or business and they can do what they want shouldn’t they?
I don’t think it realy actually has much to do with guns. It’s about privacy. Something the Supreme Court has been trying to murder for the last 50 years.
Don’t get me wrong, I do see the gun owners arguments here. What’s wrong with putting up a sign? That’s a legitimate point. But the law itself and the Supreme Court challenge brings it into a different Realm. If the owner of a private domicile or business wants it to be different, they want to have individual decision making on a case-by-case basis, why shouldn’t they? It’s their private home or business and they can do what they want shouldn’t they?