• TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6日前

    What? If you are being pedantic by focusing on my first statement and completely ignoring where I elaborated, what are we actually discussing here? My choice of words?

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6日前

      Uhh yeah. Your choice of words in a written communication are pretty important. You said genocide only matters if it’s done to a race. I said you were wrong. You provided the definition, which proved you were wrong. You insulted me. I insulted you back. I’m sorry if this was a difficult chain for you to follow. Better luck next time.

      • TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5日前

        Yes I did under define, then elaborated to correct that. It’s a human way to communicate conscisely. I am sorry for insulting you but attacking someone whole wielding a wrong definition yourself came across as rude to me and as a statement wholly driven by ego.

        Someone else commented that genocide is any group, which is just short sighted. I’ll be elaborating further there if your ego demands you nitpick further.