• november@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, that’s my point. Not sure why you think “it will mindlessly regurgitate whatever it reads” is supposed to be a defense.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The point is that that’s what’s in the library.

        No one ever said it doesn’t “mindlessly regurgitate what it reads”.

        • november@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Lots of people have said that it’s a great assistant because of how much it’s read.

          Lots of people think it’s infallible.

          Lots of people even think it’s fucking sentient.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Lots of people are morons.

            Lots of people think you should wash raw chicken with dish soap before you cook it.

            Lots of people think lots of stupid things.

            • november@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              So, to summarize, your viewpoint is:

              AI is a great assistant because of everything it’s read, even if the things it’s read can and will cause it to give dangerous information to people who are too stupid to know better?

              What exactly are you doing in the Fuck AI community?