• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Even if we called them LLMs, which we should, people will keep having these negative connotations to the technology because of overmarketing. This feature is still using LLMs, and that’s not supposed to be a bad thing.

      Stop blaming the technology, and blame the corpos pushing it to the moon. This is “BitTorrent is only used for piracy” bullshit all over again.

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But it is AI, so it should be called that. People should adjust their simplistic notions about the term instead

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, it isn’t. Intelligence implies independence. What it is is a fancy algorithm with a big data set.

        It doesn’t have to be general ai to be called ai, but so far none of the models I’m aware of have reached a standard to be called intelligence in the colloquial sense for sure

    • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This would have been better received if they just didn’t use AI in the name. Sure, it’s just using an LLM under the hood, but it’s running purely locally. It also betters Linux since it helps address an accessibility issue.