In the case of YouTube, only after a few results they become completely unrelated to my search.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Both have been prioritising “engagement” over “results” because it allows them to advertise to you more.

    In case you didn’t realise, if the product is free, you’re the product and both have been doing an amazing job out of extracting value from your eyeballs.

    Unsurprisingly, they’re both owned by the same company.

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      The “results” portion they got rid of is credibility of the results based on cross linking i.e. people linking to useful resources. It was the thing that made Google the best search engine.

      Noe they prioritise what sell the most ads as the top priority.

  • soratoyuki@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s so bad. I keep searching topics on YouTube and getting 3-4 results before YouTube starts recommending videos based on past searches or past watched videos. Like, excuse me YouTube, what the fuck? You search what I tell you to search.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      All the categories seems wildly divorced from what’s actually in them and half the time the category only suggests two videos… to me it feels like YouTube decides what you watch, today your suggestions are 90% old music videos, tomorrow a bunch of random machining videos, next day fail videos, rinse and repeat - obviously it’s based on your interests not mine but I’m sure everyone is having the same shitty experience

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    It also feels like some pages in top results didn’t even exist before I made the search. They are filled with generic babble about the subject without ever going to details or conclusions. Dribble that no human would ever write

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    Dunno about Google but Youtube seems to be making some things harder on purpose, like seeing the date of a video or showing search results in chronological order.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Yes. I have regularly been using DDG, but would wind up using google sometimes anyway. Now I’m actively forced to use other engines because google is now a monetized results server and will return zero or no relevant results in favor or sponsored or monetized results.

      • lautan@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Doesn’t mean capitalism is bad. Google has a search monoply, there are plenty of other search engines but how can they compete.

        • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          If a guy starts a wildfire to get hired as a fireman because he needs to feed his family then capitalism is bad. There are a lot of examples. Maybe you’re saying it’s not capitalism, but human nature?

    • ikilledlaurapalmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      DDG is worse though—so much of the time all I get are pages that were created by an LLM to be search engine optimized. Hollow language and a table of contents just so they can tell me how long to cook rice

  • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m annoyed that YT got rid of the search by newest first option. At least Rumble has it still

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      That feeling when you’re trying to browse through a creator you like’s page for videos you haven’t seen yet, but you have to scroll past the dozens and dozens of things you’ve already watched, which each take time to load their thumbnails, making the task drag on for ages.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s on purpose. The longer you scroll, the longer you’re on the platform. That’s higher engagement numbers and is used to expose you to/negotiate higher prices from advertisements.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Probably because it’s prioritising what it thinks you’re more likely to click on more than the actual search term. AI recommendations basically.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Which sucks when you’re the kind of person that craves novelty. Just because I watched a nature documentary about sharks doesn’t mean all I want to watch are shark videos. YouTube doesn’t seem to understand that.

      Thankfully, a lot of people gave really good suggestions when I made this Ask Lemmy post a few months ago. I’m still working my way down the list. Whenever YouTube search fails to give me something new or interesting, I check back on that page and pick a channel somebody suggested. Otherwise, the algorithm gets real stale, real quick.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just love how YouTube has a “show unwatched” button in its search that usually shows me videos I have watched multiple times.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s been bad for a few years already but it is getting worse. A good chunk of the internet isn’t indexing anymore (places which require logins to get the content), and those that are largely exist to earn from the advertising, not to be helpful.

    There’s actually an opportunity for a disruptive force here. If you can be better at search than Google, you could steal users. But duckduckgo and related are mostly trying to be old Google rather than better Google.

  • bpalmerau@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    What you’re seeing is called ‘enshittification’. In this particular example, in 2019, Prabhakar Raghavan – the ex-McKinsey, ex-Yahoo MBA who ran ad revenue for Google – came up with an ingenious solution: just make search worse. If you have to run multiple searches to find what you’re looking for, that creates multiple chances to show you an ad. No really. This is real. https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

    Why do people put up with this? You can find out more about enshittification here:

    Short explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2e-c9SF5nE

    Longer explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZaoWpQ-3Zs

    Book: https://craphound.com/shop/

  • celia@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yes! It’s very hard to find alternatives to social media sites through google. Get choked in dozens of whiny blogs of ‘social media isn’t what it used to be’ articles instead. Had to find duck duck go on yahoo then find alternative social media sites on duck duck go.