National’s unaffordable tax cuts to be funded by… (checks notes) …giving more people lung cancer.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 年前

    This law always felt weird to me, the idea that one adult would be legally allowed to smoke cigarettes, but another adult a day younger would be unable to.

    • David Palmer@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      They would be unable to buy cigarettes, there would be no law against smoking them. That’s an important difference.

      So how would you propose we end the sale of tobacco?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Tax it more, and make it available for sale only in specialist retailers, would be a great way to dramatically decrease the amount sold.

        I don’t think ending the sale altogether is worthwhile actually, this will merely create a black market for the product.

    • liv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Really? It was a law I thought of myself as a kid because it just seemed logical and makes way more sense than sudden prohibition.

      So when it became law I was pleased, because I don’t see smoking as a genuine choice for addicts. I used to live next to someone who was literally dying of emphysemia and she couldn’t give up smoking, and her self-hate and despair made a big impression on me.

      another adult a day younger

      It’s less stark but health changes always have an arbitrary cut off, there is always a last person to get/first person to not get. E.g last person to get old style knee replacement, first person to get new style.