• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    1998 not only had the best scrollbar, but the best UI overall. Shoulda just stopped then and we would have utopia by now

    • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d say 2001 and 2006 purely because the scrollbar is textured in a way that make it seem dragable at first glance |=|.

      Which is standard by now but still, besides that 1998 has all the other visual cues to denote what’s clickable and i would otherwise agree as i generally prefer flatter designs.

  • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate the modern ones you need to hover above so they even display, and then it’s 1 pixel wide and a shade of grey that’s about 2% darker than white.
    Less functional and 500 lines of js garbage.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a few lines of css, no JS required.

      .my-div:hover {
        overflow-x: scroll;
      }
      

      And the look and feel of the scrollbar is generally determined by the browser/OS. Unless someone does a custom scrollbar implementation, but that is exceedingly rare. So that thin rounded gray bar is a browser/OS design, again, without any JS.

    • M137@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some suck, sure, but some work well. The ones on MacOS are good IMO, and some android ones (while others absolutely suck).

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        that’d be helpful if they were wider than 5px.

        I’m in my 50s with macular degeneration so seeing small things can be difficult.

        • adhdsergio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah they’re not great in that regard. Still, i’d expect a setting in accessibility to help with this. I’m not near a computer now but i’ll look next time

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      UX, whatsat?

      Also, it completely disappears after a second.

      And why is it a different color on the addons page anyway??

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    1998 was truly the best time. When all OS widgets looked the same. And could be used in apps, and everything had a consistent look. Yeah you could override this in your app. But fuck people who did that. Everything looked so nice and uniform and you knew what to expect from a widget and its look and behavior. Get off my lawn.

  • poinck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    To me, they are just indicators of how much content I can expect. I scroll with the mouse wheel or using the page down/up keys. I don’t grab the thing. I only need to see the indicator when I am scrolling.

    But I wonder whether there is a accesibility aspect to always visible and wide scrollbars. I think, the best way to deal with it, is to make it an option how they look and behave.

    • anugeshtu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What about some scrollable window with something like 10k+ lines, though? Sure, if you have a mouse with a free-spinning function, it’s still doable, but a draggable scrollbar comes in handy then.

      • poinck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Maybe a smart way to handle that would be to show a wide scrollbar when there is so much content? Idk.

        I would probably expect filters that are always visible regardless at which line I am currently. Sadly, this isn’t the case very often and I have to go back to the top and apply the filters.

    • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Touchscreens don’t have wheels on them. Styluses/pens also don’t (usually). The latter usually acts more as a mouse than a touchscreen in software, so you can’t scroll by dragging the page.

  • antonim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do you remember the feel of switching from 1998 to 2001? It felt like stepping into the future.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love how 1998 looks. It is clean and servers the purpose. 2001-2009 feel over designed, 1988 and 2012 not sure whether the dark part is the scroller or the light part lol.