• RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is just an expansion on “violence is inherently bad” which as an anarchist I hope isn’t something you believe

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Violence is inherently harmful.

      Some people and institutions do deserve to be harmed. Those people and institutions are almost never who actually gets harmed in war. War sucks.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        do you know what’s harmful? capitalism. i’d suffer every pain for the world to achieve socialism. yes, you might not believe it, having a comfortable life in the global north, but there are people willing to be harmed to achieve liberation.

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So would you oppose a war of liberation, such as the Vietnamese fought against Japan, France and America?

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, not really.

          But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.

          • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.

            “The Palestinian struggle against the Israeli settler colonialists is not a war of liberation actually”

            You might possibly be the least intelligent person I’ve ever seen.

              • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                War is defined by the instigator.

                Maybe, if you’re a simpleton who needs everything boiled down to a single slogan/view due to being incapable of perceiving and analysing the totality of the event.

                The great patriotic war was a war of liberation despite the Nazis instigating.

                The war of resistance against Japan was again a war of liberation despite the Japanese instigating.

                The Korean war was again a war of liberation despite it being instigated by the US and it’s client state.

                And so on.

              • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                War is defined by the instigator

                I don’t understand what you mean by this. Defined in what way?