• zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If a machine can do my job better than me, then a machine should be doing that job. That’s progress. Eventually all of this mindless toil should be done by machines so that people have the ability to pursue their dreams. The actual problem is that we’ve built a society where people need to toil mindlessly in order to live. This could be solved with something like a Universal Basic Income, so if my job gets taken by an LLM I can go back to school and learn a new trade. Or write some books. Or go ramble around Europe as an art bum. Or whatever.

    Having said that, I think that LLMs are being used to replace jobs where the machine can’t do it better than a human. It saves the company money in the short term, but it’s going to catch up with them in the long term. On the other hand, some people are doing jobs that don’t need doing, and replacing those with an LLM doesn’t change anything, because the job was bullshit to begin with.

    At the end of the day, people need food, lodging, and healthcare. They don’t need “jobs”. We should be fighting to get people’s needs met, not fighting to keep people in their shitty jobs that they hate anyway.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      We don’t need machines to do everything to get that. We already have everything for a post scarcity-society. It’s there now. But a lot of assholes want a bigger pile of money, and honestly, I’m pretty sure they don’t actually want you or I to exist to get in the way of their utopia which is them hanging out on beaches while robots do everything for them.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      At the end of the day, people need food, lodging, and healthcare. They don’t need “jobs”. We should be fighting to get people’s needs met, not fighting to keep people in their shitty jobs that they hate anyway.

      On one hand, I agree with you.

      On the other hand, what you’re saying is, “Life would be better if we would become wholly dependent on a white supremacist, genocidal, colonial institution”.

      I don’t think what you’re suggesting is possible on the land known as the United States of America until it’s no longer called that.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re assuming everybody in this conversation is American? 🤔 I for one am not part of the “we” you describe there…

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Your nation is either beholden to the imperialist pigdogs which run America or you will be targeted by them. So sorry (truly), but yes, you are “we”, even if it’s a more extended “we”. Maybe you can fly under the radar if your country is both poor and resource-poor.

          …Aside from that this is a thread about an American university, so

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I completely agree with everything here, and I just want to reiterate:

      👏 Universal 👏 Basic 👏 Income