Well possibly not comprehension, in my defence I would say I was referencing the world as it is not as we might wish it to be. I know that is balked at but it is a useful exercise sometimes as it is the place we live. This is not the right platform for such back-and-forthing though as any alternative points of view are heavily downvoted in the name of free speech by people who smell slightly of boats.
Just to be clear, I did not downvote you, because you made your point intentionally vague, and even though I believe it to be the typical incel-bullshit it sounds like, I asked you to clarify on the off chance that I’m wrong.
So please explain. You say you reference the ‘world as it is’ and in this hypothetical world, women have a superpower, right? Which superpower were you talking about, and how would AI take it away?
Being a misogynist is a choice. Being a woman isn’t.
But keep pretending it’s the same thing, just as an incel would.
Edit: and please don’t come back with the “being involuntarily celibate is not a choice,” because we both (and everyone else besides) know very well that self-proclaimed incels are something else entirely.
And if you would please answer the question I asked twice already: Which superpower were you talking about and how would AI take it away?
I did not know it was acceptable to be prejudiced against a group if inclusion within that group was voluntary. So by your logic you condone prejudice against the Black Panther Party and Greenpeace.
Still not answering my question, are you? I’m not playing this game. You keep derailing to avoid answering. It’s cowardly. And very, very obvious. I prefer to spend my time on other things.
I said very early on that I would not argue that query on this platform and just imagined saying it once was sufficient and that repetition would be pointless, an opinion about repetition you clearly do not share. I find it interesting that you did not answer my point about your support of prejudice against the Black Panthers in the same message that you make the complaint of my not answering your point, which as I noted I had closed a few messages back.
You could have answered the question and then deleted the comment. You may as well delete the entirety of your comment thread at this point. It amounts to the same thing.
Well possibly not comprehension, in my defence I would say I was referencing the world as it is not as we might wish it to be. I know that is balked at but it is a useful exercise sometimes as it is the place we live. This is not the right platform for such back-and-forthing though as any alternative points of view are heavily downvoted in the name of free speech by people who smell slightly of boats.
Smell slightly of boats? Dude. Dog whistles are meant to be inaudible, not police whistles.
If you’re not willing to explain it’s because you know your hot take is shit and you’re too weak and insecure to handle a challenge
Downvotes don’t impact your ability to explain the reasoning behind your questionable claim. Don’t be a coward.
They are disheartening though and it is not cowardly to avoid conversation, we do it all the time.
Hard disagree. You made a thinly veiled point. Unveil it.
Don’t waste your time. Just tag Miller as a incel coward (or block him) and move on with your life - that’s what I’m gonna do. :-)
Just to be clear, I did not downvote you, because you made your point intentionally vague, and even though I believe it to be the typical incel-bullshit it sounds like, I asked you to clarify on the off chance that I’m wrong.
So please explain. You say you reference the ‘world as it is’ and in this hypothetical world, women have a superpower, right? Which superpower were you talking about, and how would AI take it away?
You reference incels in the way some men reference women.
Says the painfully obvious incel.
Being a misogynist is a choice. Being a woman isn’t.
But keep pretending it’s the same thing, just as an incel would.
Edit: and please don’t come back with the “being involuntarily celibate is not a choice,” because we both (and everyone else besides) know very well that self-proclaimed incels are something else entirely.
And if you would please answer the question I asked twice already: Which superpower were you talking about and how would AI take it away?
I did not know it was acceptable to be prejudiced against a group if inclusion within that group was voluntary. So by your logic you condone prejudice against the Black Panther Party and Greenpeace.
Still not answering my question, are you? I’m not playing this game. You keep derailing to avoid answering. It’s cowardly. And very, very obvious. I prefer to spend my time on other things.
Have a nice day, I guess.
I said very early on that I would not argue that query on this platform and just imagined saying it once was sufficient and that repetition would be pointless, an opinion about repetition you clearly do not share. I find it interesting that you did not answer my point about your support of prejudice against the Black Panthers in the same message that you make the complaint of my not answering your point, which as I noted I had closed a few messages back.
Yes. You wimped out very early in the conversation and everybody else is mocking you for it. And you keep digging yourself in deeper.
You could have answered the question and then deleted the comment. You may as well delete the entirety of your comment thread at this point. It amounts to the same thing.