• Substance_P@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So is this essentially the “gain of function” version of testing digital security? Sure it needs to be done, sure there are huge bug bounties, but this reads like a group of egotistical nihlists Chaos enthusiasts who are leaning heavily on an AI tool, assessing its output, then cleaning the conclusions up for the photo finish and bragging rights.

    The last sentence makes me uneasy "But this is the fun part about AI. Small teams can suddenly do things that used to require entire organizations. With the right strategy and people, even a tiny company can become mighty enough that the world’s largest companies start asking for its help.

    Thanks Mythos Preview.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yea they are blowhards, but the tool let them find something that used to take nation state funding and a ton of time. The pressures are different here and it is for the better. Let them take a bow. We all benefit.