• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    $35 of groceries is only 4 to 8 meals, not to mention hygiene and household items. One person would spend much more than that weekly if they’re not dining out.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      $35 is a lot of oatmeal, bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, beans, and frozen veg. Maybe some raisins for fruit. No, it’s not fun, but you eat miserable food when you live in a food desert and have no money. Also, the passage says at least, not only. She’s probably spending more.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        She’s probably spending more

        that’s my point, spending $35 to avoid the extra fee is not really a problem, because one can easily do that with everyday food for one person per week. In fact it’d be really hard to spend less than that on food.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          spending $35 to avoid the extra fee is not really a problem

          If it’s making it so that she can only order groceries every 2 weeks, I’d consider that a problem. The fee itself isn’t the root cause, but it’s another barrier. I don’t believe for a second that your quality of life wouldn’t be impacted if you only ordered groceries every 2 weeks.