Clem talks about that in the comments. What are some no hassle, Debian based, rustless distros as alternative to Mint?

  • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9日前

    It’s the tool used to enshitification of Linux, that’s my problem. Tech and politics are indivisible. We’re on lemmy.ml so that should be a no-brainer.

    Also, technically, it’s not very stable and there’s no alternative for the compiler.

    • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5日前

      Rust is the only reason I’m remotely interested in low level programming and potentially contributing to Linux. C and C++ are unreadable and vastly more confusing in terms of ecosystem to be worth dealing with for my own enjoyment. I don’t really understand the rust hate.

        • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2日前

          Ah yes a programming language determines the mental state and acuity of the person using it. This might be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read in my entire life. Are you sure you aren’t the one we need to test with such ludicrous ideas?

          • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15時間前

            Not what I meant. The Rust language appeals a particular type of neuro type especially. And with that neurotype, there comes some specific design behaviours.

            • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14時間前

              There’s a “neurotype”… associated with liking a programming language? Are you some kind of nazi or something?

      • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5日前

        The reason was pretty well stated already.

        If your contribution were MIT licensed, some would rather you hadn’t written a single line of ecosystem destroying code.

        • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5日前

          Others would say it’s open source who gaf what happens with it, the codes probably already in the training data for llms anyway. Depends on your philosophy of open source. I’d rather have gpl than mit, but I’d rather use rust than c I guess so such is my opinion