• merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    That commie architecture is so sad! Is that in the Democratic Pedophile Republic of America?

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Australia definitely does this. Developers will just build an entire town with houses that all look something like this (except its a maze that’s unreasonably difficult to navigate) 0 public transport and something like 1 road in and out that everyone needs to drive through to get to there job everyday.

  • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Now that everyone buys everything off Amazon, even inside houses I am noticing people are owning a lot of the same first-that-came-up-in-a-search items.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I expect this sort of stuff will make the collapse in the US far worse than it was for USSR. Car culture entirely depends on well functioning logistics. Once those start to break down then all hell is going to break loose. It’s only going to take a short disruption of food and fuel being delivered to the suburbs to make them unlivable.

      • Sualtam@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Well if the system fails a bit, your bus or tram won’t drive because the driver isn’t paid.

        If the system fails so hard that fuel isn’t available at all, you have a catastrophe uncompatible to industrial society in total.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          People actually did keep going to their jobs during USSR collapse even when their salaries weren’t coming in. A lot of infrastructure kept working because of that. Again, a very different type of society from what we see in the US.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        For sure. Everything about US infrastructure is built around cars and the availability of gas. If gas becomes a luxury commodity, then the suburbs could to turn into mad max.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Indeed, and the whole culture of rugged individualism doesn’t really help things either. People in a socialist society like USSR were able to come together and help each other, but in the US it’s going to be dog eat dog.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hey my house has the door on the left in my block! And its cyan! Not like the others with their flat ugly blue doors!

  • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    On the one hand, I guess it’s a more efficient packing of people into urban areas than having large green spaces. On the other hand, it’s fucking depressing, and I think kids miss something in childhood without psuedo wild spaces to go explore alone.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually maintained soviet apartment blocs aren’t nearly as depressing as the ones taken in winter, that haven’t been maintained properly since the dissolution of socialism:

      These apartments provided housing for people that lived largely in shacks, where smoke from heating caused early deaths:

      Soviet city planning made things walkable, with schools, playgrounds, and greenery within walking distance from nearly every apartment.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I grew up in a Soviet apartment bloc, and I did way more exploring outside than kids living in suburbia could ever hope to. For one, it was completely safe to let kids go out and play on their own. There were always green spaces and playgrounds between a few apartment buildings, and you’d go and play there.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Can confirm. We used to play till 10PM (cause we had to wake up early for school) around the apartment bloc and around the neighbourhood. In the pre-cellpone era parents would call their kids from their balconies to come home. At the height of organized crime that arose post-1989, people felt that safe about their kids playing unsupervised.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, it’s kind of unthinkable today honestly. I don’t know anybody who’d just let their kids out on their own, and you’d probably get charged with neglect if you did.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you’re talking about the OP image, it’s actually inefficient as fuck. The houses depicted there house the same number of people as one or maybe two apartment blocks. And those apartment blocks can then have a bunch of greenery between them.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I think you just need well-placed parks in the urban areas. I think it’s worth asking ourselves why we don’t really hear people bemoan the upbringing and experiences of kids from really urban cities like NYC or Tokyo. But when it comes to Soviet apartment blocs, this becomes a real concern. I think it’s a double-standard that’s been propagandized onto us.

      Notice the multiple “I thinks” – it’s not like I’m out here doing surveys on the topic. This is just how it seems to me.

      • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t know about Tokyo or what the options really are for raising kids in Japan. But I think (I’ll join you here with spewing opinion/ conjecture everywhere) in the US a lot of people intentionally leave cities once they decide to have kids. When you are a young professional in your 20s, it’s still very popular to live in dense urban centers, but then as you get married and start having kids, the vast majority of people move out to the suburbs or more rural areas. Now, obviously this is a privileged class of people, and maybe there are different trends in socioeconomic classes above and below them. And perhaps they move out of the city for other reasons (the price of housing, the quality of schools, etc), but I think access to nature also plays a part. But I say this as a girl scout troop leader, so I’m definitely biased.