Protecting children online is crucial, but forcing every user to hand over their ID is a privacy nightmare waiting to happen, according to the head of the Swiss privacy firm
I didn’t read the whole doc. How would this prevent kill switch network if the government can just tell internet service providers to shutdown the network?
Reticulum is a backbone mesh. It speaks on all communication interfaces. Bluetooth, Wifi, LoRa, Serial.
Conceptually, if you can see your neighbors wifi, you could mesh. Suburbs could be pretty well connected. I doubt it’ll scale past a small suburb, though. If someone has a high tower, you could LoRa line of sight to anywhere. The upside is, if you have a faster connection that LoRa, it can use it. If you just have LoRa, you can chat or maybe send small images or low quality voice chat.
I didn’t read the whole doc. How would this prevent kill switch network if the government can just tell internet service providers to shutdown the network?
Well in theory it can communicate over other networks. Like radio
Reticulum is a backbone mesh. It speaks on all communication interfaces. Bluetooth, Wifi, LoRa, Serial.
Conceptually, if you can see your neighbors wifi, you could mesh. Suburbs could be pretty well connected. I doubt it’ll scale past a small suburb, though. If someone has a high tower, you could LoRa line of sight to anywhere. The upside is, if you have a faster connection that LoRa, it can use it. If you just have LoRa, you can chat or maybe send small images or low quality voice chat.
Because reticulum don’t use providers to reach other like on internet. It is working fine if there are enoug individuals nodes.
Edit : auto completion carnage.
Can you rephrase that? I’m not sure what “you nice it is used well enough” is supposed to mean.
My bad, auto completion and not rereading me did that.
Thank you, perfectly legible now. 😊