• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe because the host cities are using tourist dollars to provide tourist services for tourists doing tourist things. It’s a $4/match benefit in exchange for taxes from a $200/night hotel (in a non-US country), 10% from whatever their food and alcohol bill is for the week, taxes from flights into/out of the city, taxes on the match tickets, etc.

    Taxes on a hotel stay in the US are like $15/night in a cheap city. NYC hotels are $30/night for state tax plus $20/night for city tax on a normal day, not during WC matches. And you are upset that some cities use that to cover $4? With hotels jacking up prices for the weeks of WC matches, and tickets costing $500 (which have sales tax as a percentage), the state is getting a ton of revenue. The Hilton in Times Square for 2 nights during the Ecuador Germany game is $541/night BEFORE an additional $90/night in taxes. $90/night in taxes and you are upset about giving a person a free subway ride to a game? I get that the matches in NJ aren’t just a subway ride away, which is why I’m siding with NJ on this case; but in most host cities in previous WCs, the matches are at stadiums with easy subway access.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Your argument would have merit if these were simply amenities provided to all tourists, because they all pay the same fees. They don’t give Swifties free transportation. Or a real “regular guy” traveling to the city to actually visit the city. If FIFA wants a special perk for their attendees they should use some of their profits to purchase it.