• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    I dunno what sort of blackmagic fuckery is going on here, but there is no way that car made that loop going that slowly.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Apparently they did!

      https://www.latimes.com/sports/la-xpm-2012-jun-30-la-sp-sn-hot-wheels-dare-world-record-20120630-story.html

      The pair drove approximately 52 mph on the track before hitting the loop and experiencing seven Gs of force while going through the loop – at a height of six stories.

      Foust, who entered the loop just after Tracy, said it was necessary to avoid driving too fast through the loop in order to prevent the car from breaking down if any part of the chassis scraped against the track. He slowed down a bit when he saw the back left of Tracy’s vehicle was damaged. If either car went slower than 48 mph, it risked losing contact with the track and falling to the ground.

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        A lot of us can drive at 52 mph (83.68 km/h in non-Freedom units), so why isn’t our infrastructure designed with loops in mind?

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        So the mass of these guy’s balls kept them on the ramp due to centrifugal forces?

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m sure the engineers had a tough time calculating the saftey factor with those gavity altering cahones in the mix.