I think it’s rather beside the point when talking about human rights. Why do you think it is relevant to repeat ad nausea in the context of human rights?
The only point I was trying to make is beside the point? You can believe whatever you want about immigrantion and how it should work. That doesn’t magically make illegal immigration legal. Law is distinct from morality.
That’s like me saying what the Nazis did was legal when someone brings up the holocaust. Like what is your point in making this distinction? To show us you understand definitions? Good for you I guess… 🙄
I think it’s rather beside the point when talking about human rights. Why do you think it is relevant to repeat ad nausea in the context of human rights?
The only point I was trying to make is beside the point? You can believe whatever you want about immigrantion and how it should work. That doesn’t magically make illegal immigration legal. Law is distinct from morality.
That’s like me saying what the Nazis did was legal when someone brings up the holocaust. Like what is your point in making this distinction? To show us you understand definitions? Good for you I guess… 🙄