I’m 90% sure they only did this as a ploy, like, “Our mascot is a non-binary fox! We’re inclusive!” when it’s just them trying to get more people to use their platform
it even: the original source of the non-binary claim is an anti-woke blog post about them removing the old mascot and replacing it with a non-binary mascot, when in fact mozilla had a logo rather than full expression of a mascot, and now they’re a fully formed branding representation of the firefox which includes non-gendered pronouns (as a feature of the characters function; not as an explicit choice about gender representation)
I’m 90% sure they only did this as a ploy, like, “Our mascot is a non-binary fox! We’re inclusive!” when it’s just them trying to get more people to use their platform
it even: the original source of the non-binary claim is an anti-woke blog post about them removing the old mascot and replacing it with a non-binary mascot, when in fact mozilla had a logo rather than full expression of a mascot, and now they’re a fully formed branding representation of the firefox which includes non-gendered pronouns (as a feature of the characters function; not as an explicit choice about gender representation)