When you do your scaling you need to scale everything. The adult population of the US is estimated as 266 million people as of now. Half a million is roughly 1 adult in 530 people. Let’s quadruple it up so they have nice relaxed works schedule. Let’s say now you need 4 people per 530. If you think you can’t find 10 out of 1000 people who would do some sanitation work, with no stress and without having to think where their next meal comes from, you just never met people.
And this is the most important part that you seem to ignore - when people’s basic means are met, they want to fulfill higher levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. For some that means doing arts or doing some engineering or running a company. For some, and there are s many of those some, that means “it’s not much but it’s honest work”. Doing small visible changes that make the world the better place one picked up piece of rubbish at a time, is exactly, precisely what significant portion of humanity will be doing.
This also works in another direction: billions of people who would be doing something grand and moving humanity further, are stuck in mundane repetitive broken jobs they hate, because they’re stuck in this cycle of needing to grind to survive, without having a moment to breath, which slowly kills every bit of light they once had a potential to have.
That half a million is an extreme lowball number based on a single waste management company. And no i dont think you’ll find 10 in every thousand evenly spread that will want to do this for fun. Those half a million people turn over every couple of months with pay and benefits. And this will apply to every industry and every critical need of society. Theres already a massive shortage of medical personelle and that pays better than most of what were discussing. No it just xoesnt scale
I like how your own numbers immediately started to be unreliable the second I used them.
Again, we’re walking in circles because you’all refuse to even acknowledge the argument.
Shitty jobs are shitty because of financial intensives to keep it so. They don’t need to be. We have shortage of sanitation workers because they have to care about “pay and benefits”, and because companies try to pay them less and make them work more so they spend less money on workforce. They hesitate to improve their working environment because there is no “economic incentive” to do so. They don’t do automation because labour is cheaper. All of that are problems caused by revolving all what we do around making profit for shareholders.
We have so much labour that we just waste on people doing bullshit with the ultimate goal of the imaginary line going up. Obviously if we keep that, we don’t get people to do other work, all the people are overworked to death and also for some reason starving and struggling.
They have shortage of medical personnel despite them being rewarded with a bunch of money, and then you turn around and say that if we don’t do financial stick and carrot, we will have shortage of workers. Do you not see the obvious problem with this logic?
When you do your scaling you need to scale everything. The adult population of the US is estimated as 266 million people as of now. Half a million is roughly 1 adult in 530 people. Let’s quadruple it up so they have nice relaxed works schedule. Let’s say now you need 4 people per 530. If you think you can’t find 10 out of 1000 people who would do some sanitation work, with no stress and without having to think where their next meal comes from, you just never met people.
And this is the most important part that you seem to ignore - when people’s basic means are met, they want to fulfill higher levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. For some that means doing arts or doing some engineering or running a company. For some, and there are s many of those some, that means “it’s not much but it’s honest work”. Doing small visible changes that make the world the better place one picked up piece of rubbish at a time, is exactly, precisely what significant portion of humanity will be doing.
This also works in another direction: billions of people who would be doing something grand and moving humanity further, are stuck in mundane repetitive broken jobs they hate, because they’re stuck in this cycle of needing to grind to survive, without having a moment to breath, which slowly kills every bit of light they once had a potential to have.
That half a million is an extreme lowball number based on a single waste management company. And no i dont think you’ll find 10 in every thousand evenly spread that will want to do this for fun. Those half a million people turn over every couple of months with pay and benefits. And this will apply to every industry and every critical need of society. Theres already a massive shortage of medical personelle and that pays better than most of what were discussing. No it just xoesnt scale
I like how your own numbers immediately started to be unreliable the second I used them.
Again, we’re walking in circles because you’all refuse to even acknowledge the argument.
Shitty jobs are shitty because of financial intensives to keep it so. They don’t need to be. We have shortage of sanitation workers because they have to care about “pay and benefits”, and because companies try to pay them less and make them work more so they spend less money on workforce. They hesitate to improve their working environment because there is no “economic incentive” to do so. They don’t do automation because labour is cheaper. All of that are problems caused by revolving all what we do around making profit for shareholders.
We have so much labour that we just waste on people doing bullshit with the ultimate goal of the imaginary line going up. Obviously if we keep that, we don’t get people to do other work, all the people are overworked to death and also for some reason starving and struggling.
They have shortage of medical personnel despite them being rewarded with a bunch of money, and then you turn around and say that if we don’t do financial stick and carrot, we will have shortage of workers. Do you not see the obvious problem with this logic?