• MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 小时前

    They’ll just add another one that clarifies it can only happen if the terms were not consecutive, of it your surname is Trump.

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 天前

    He has never won from a man. Only against two women.

    Now, I would not interpret that as a “thing” or a “dig” at myself… But I know the orange tangerine definitely would not like to be reminded.

    Let’s remind him. Constantly.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 天前

    Obama should announce that’ll he’ll run, if Trump does. That alone would probably end the whole idea.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      I don’t think so. That would only make his wish to run and win against Obama even stronger. I am perfectly sure he thinks he could win in such a contest. He is after all a completely delusional pathological narcissist.

      • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        And don’t forget, he has control of the whole federal government at the moment. He’s attacking his political enemies and attacking voting rights. It would be entirely within his current M.O. to either politically jail Obama, or change the voting laws to favor himself over Obama by restricting access to PoC being allowed to vote, sending ICE to deport anyone who tries to vote without bringing their social security card and birth certificate, etc.

        The SCOTUS is also on his side if there ever ends up being a debate about the results, so super fucked.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 天前

          Honestly there’s a variety of legitimate reasons to put Obama in jail. It’s a fraction of the number of reasons to put trump in jail, but they’re there

          • AlexLost@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 天前

            Sure, and how many times has Obama been impeached? Thought so. You can not like your country all you want, but there is a way to do things and a way not to. Obama did it the way you are supposed to and Trump does whatever he feels like at any given moment. These are not even in the same realm of problems to deal with. Keep beating that dead horse though, eh!

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 天前

              Obama did it the way you are supposed to

              He ordered a drone strike on an American citizen lmao. 5th amendment much?

                • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 小时前

                  Yes, both sides bad.

                  No, there’s only one side.

                  Now what are you doing about your country burning down around you

                  Recognizing that the problem is bigger than just republicans, which is more than most people are doing.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 天前

    That’s why they’re floating the “no CONSECUTIVE 2 terms” is the actual interpretation.

    It’s like the “no Homers club” letting you have exactly one Homer.

    • orioler25@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 天前

      I mean, that same constitution has protected slavery for the past 150 years. That’s a problem; has been for a lil while. Why is it a dictatorship at this point and not like, the Patriot Act?

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 天前

    They already have a solution for that. They want to change it to say "no more than two consecutive terms.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 天前

    Trump then issues an executive order that only Trump brand voting machines will be allowed.

    Supreme Court response: “I’ll allow it.”

      • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 天前

        They’ll be so woke!

        Jokes aside, Obama was still the better man, even if he was an asshole next to being a Democrat. Trump is an asshole and nothing else.

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        True

        I do find it remarkable that RW people (e.g nick Fuentes) are saying they’d rather have Obama back, now, however.

  • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 天前

    They were playing with ideas to prevent this. I.e. the limit only applies to consecutive terms. Obama had two consecutive terms, Trump didnt

  • cøre@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 天前

    No thanks, I don’t want to go back to the politicians that helped get us Trump

      • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 天前

        Obama didn’t help make Trump happen because of his skin color or any conspiracy.

        Obama helped by promising desperately needed “hope and change” and then dissolving his more deeply left grass roots organizations who helped get him elected.

        Obama helped Biden coalesce the neoliberal wagons around his campaign to win at a critical moment during the 2020 presidential primary.

        Obama was more concerned with appearing noble in his politics than using power to fully address peoples’ material needs and thereby more effectively inoculating said desperate people from demagoguery offering scapegoats to blame at those needs being unmet.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        No its because he didn’t follow through on any of his promises and caused many to lose faith in politics even more.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 天前

          That is blaming Obama for Republican’s loudly announced policy of obstructing literally everything Obama tried to do including voting against their own Republican bills if Obama agreed.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 天前

            Yes, it’s always the obstructions of the Republicans that stopped prior Democratic presidents, always powerless and always someone else to blame for their failings.

            Meanwhile Trump does whatever the fuck he wants

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      To me, this just reads as “we can’t let the chuds get mad we elected a black president again”

      …but maybe you mean neolibs. Its Lemmy, you mean neolibs…right?

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    There are already thousands of people rubbing their hands together figuring out how to sabotage him, because “better than Trump” is unacceptable. “Either completely unblemished perfection (with moving goalposts) or we’re not only not helping, we’re actively sabotaging!”