Article stolen directly from The New York Times. No clue what “DNYUZ” is supposed to mean, and there’s no trace of ownership on the site, but it’s clearly just aggregating stories from elsewhere and then minimally acknowledging their verbatim taking at the bottom.
Bad for a lot of reasons, and I’m not talking about the ones that hurt the publisher. There are no updates to the article should they become available, the average reader won’t know the source of what they’re reading, ostensibly images in the article body are missing…
Article stolen directly from The New York Times. No clue what “DNYUZ” is supposed to mean, and there’s no trace of ownership on the site, but it’s clearly just aggregating stories from elsewhere and then minimally acknowledging their verbatim taking at the bottom.
Bad for a lot of reasons, and I’m not talking about the ones that hurt the publisher. There are no updates to the article should they become available, the average reader won’t know the source of what they’re reading, ostensibly images in the article body are missing…
…literally at the bottom of the article including a link to the original article.
I had a whole paragraph here … but it is basically that i think that you are an idiot. Blocked.