• flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    agreed. when folks come with “yeah but iran murders protestors” and the response is “so does the US” and people dismiss that because “iran murdered thousands…” I like to ask people for the top number they are ok with. Is 2 ok? But 1000 bad? Ok so what about 20? (hinting along that the number should be zero.)

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ok so your counter argument to “but they killed 20k protestors” is literally “would it really be better if they only killed 2?”

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        no. its not an argument it is a question to the interlocutor; if they are mad at iran but not mad at the US they clearly have a number that is ok.

        • beansoup@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          “If they are mad at Iran and not mad at the US…” It’s because they’re racist. It’s not a numbers thing. US sanctions kill 500 thousand people every year. The death and destruction that the US has brought upon the world is astronomical, but because of US exceptionalism, a lot of people refuse to see it, especially in the West.

        • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sounds like you’re the one here with ‘a number they’re ok with’

          And apparently that number is 20k