• mustlovehuskies@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Statistically not really. I’ve been part of liberal gun groups in the past and it was hard to get any traction. Many of the members were also extremely fuddy and mocked people for having “evil black rifles” rather than their preferred .38 cal revolver and 130 year old bolt action rifle.

      Republicans own guns at nearly 3x the rate of Democrats, according to Pew, and only a portion of democrats would be considered “liberal” and even fewer leftist, while nearly all republicans would be considered conservative globally. I would wager a lot of money that the proportion is even more skewed if you were looking at just ARs and other types of guns that would be decently suited for combat rather than grandpappy’s hunting rifle or a rusty old revolver.

      • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Having a lot of guns doesn’t mean shit when you can only use one gun at a time.

        If 25 people are fighting 33 people, but that 25 people have 75 guns and the 33 people have 33 guns, it’s still an equitable fight.

          • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            My point is that people horde guns.

            If you have 1 person who owns 25 guns and another who owns one. They are equal. Also, during an actual war, this would literally be a moot point as the state would be arming people.

            • mustlovehuskies@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Not really. The guy with 25 guns can arm 24 friends. The state would hardly be arming people, the military would be directly involved on one side or the other. A civil war between left and right would absolutely not work out well for the left.

              • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                24 friends who don’t want to fight?

                You don’t think the liberal states wouldn’t arm their on fighting groups if open civil war happened? Cmon now.

                • mustlovehuskies@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 minutes ago

                  You’re making a baseless assumption that the 24 friends wouldn’t want to fight. Doesn’t own a gun yet doesn’t mean won’t join the fight. Liberal states won’t arm citizens, that’s inconsistent with their core principles. Besides that, they’d end up arming conservatives too because we’d just fake being liberal to get a free gun. Already take advantage of liberal gun buy”back” programs by forcing you idiots to buy pipeguns and shitty broken guns to fund our ammo budget 😂

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Very liberal here and grew up in WV. Father was card carrying NRA. It was tradition in my family that you got a gun on your 10th birthday (a Ruger 10/22, not like an AR-15). We were taught very early about hunting, gun safety, and proper handling of a firearm. Don’t really own one right now … wife was very much against them with children in the house. She was never really exposed to them which is a large reason why. Although my step-son is also very liberal and a cop so there is that.

      I’ve considered getting a firearm recently for lots of obvious reasons. Likely a handgun but I’d really like a long gun. I was pretty accurate when I was younger.

      I imagine there are lots more like me than people realize.