• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you read the title of the article, it would seem this is absolutely enforceable.

    Also, of course Lemmy is arguing in favour of child sex dolls, I’d expect nothing less.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      lol they’re not arguing against because it’s a pointless measure

      you’re confusing picking your fights with being supportive

      • Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If children sex dolls are readily available it risks normalizing the concept of sex with children. Both for potential pedophiles as well as children who browse shein, might get the impression that adults having sex with children is a thing.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It absolutely has a point, the point being manufacturing and selling sex toys that look like children is absolutely disgusting.

        And picking your battles doesn’t typically mean arguing against the law being passed on the Internet.

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults.

              You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well?

              • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me.

                Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

                • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me.

                  Adult men having sex with another man? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

                  Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it’s good enough to ban sex dolls?

                  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          ah, the point is that it’s disgusting, thanks for confirming the emptiness of the argument

          next time I’m before an unflushed toilet I’ll call the authorities