Beep@lemmus.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFrance bids to suspend Shein over childlike sex dollslockwww.abc.net.auexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1321arrow-down110
arrow-up1311arrow-down1external-linkFrance bids to suspend Shein over childlike sex dollslockwww.abc.net.auBeep@lemmus.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down28·edit-22 days agoIf you read the title of the article, it would seem this is absolutely enforceable. Also, of course Lemmy is arguing in favour of child sex dolls, I’d expect nothing less.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agolol they’re not arguing against because it’s a pointless measure you’re confusing picking your fights with being supportive
minus-squareMirror Giraffe@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoIf children sex dolls are readily available it risks normalizing the concept of sex with children. Both for potential pedophiles as well as children who browse shein, might get the impression that adults having sex with children is a thing.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down9·2 days agoIt absolutely has a point, the point being manufacturing and selling sex toys that look like children is absolutely disgusting. And picking your battles doesn’t typically mean arguing against the law being passed on the Internet.
minus-squareIconoclast@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 day ago is absolutely disgusting Why not ban scat fetish then as well?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 day agoScat fetish typically involves grown adults.
minus-squareIconoclast@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoHaving sex with a doll also only involves grown adults. You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 day agoAdults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me. Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view.
minus-squareIconoclast@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·edit-21 day agoAdult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another man? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it’s good enough to ban sex dolls?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·edit-21 day agoI have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·edit-22 days agoah, the point is that it’s disgusting, thanks for confirming the emptiness of the argument next time I’m before an unflushed toilet I’ll call the authorities
If you read the title of the article, it would seem this is absolutely enforceable.
Also, of course Lemmy is arguing in favour of child sex dolls, I’d expect nothing less.
lol they’re not arguing against because it’s a pointless measure
you’re confusing picking your fights with being supportive
If children sex dolls are readily available it risks normalizing the concept of sex with children. Both for potential pedophiles as well as children who browse shein, might get the impression that adults having sex with children is a thing.
It absolutely has a point, the point being manufacturing and selling sex toys that look like children is absolutely disgusting.
And picking your battles doesn’t typically mean arguing against the law being passed on the Internet.
Why not ban scat fetish then as well?
Scat fetish typically involves grown adults.
Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults.
You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well?
Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me.
Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view.
Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me.
Adult men having sex with another man? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view.
Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it’s good enough to ban sex dolls?
I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet.
ah, the point is that it’s disgusting, thanks for confirming the emptiness of the argument
next time I’m before an unflushed toilet I’ll call the authorities