• “Cloud First”: To move federal agencies to the cloud, the government created a program known as FedRAMP, whose job was to ensure the security of new technology.
  • Security Breakdown: ProPublica found that FedRAMP authorized a Microsoft product called GCC High to handle sensitive government data, despite years of concerns about its security.
  • Potential Conflict of Interest: The government relies, in part, on third-party firms to vet cloud technology, but those firms are hired and paid by the company being assessed.
  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    There is no certification process in place for using a cloud to store HIPAA data. It even says that on the page that you linked. Legally, any organization that used this service would be opening themselves to further liability under HIPAA.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Tell that to literally every hospital, medical provider, and insurer in the United States.

      They’re all using AWS, and OneDrive.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s news to me. Every time to vendor tries to get me to switch to their cloud product I tell them to get lost. I’m not willingly handing over patient data to these clowns, I’ve seen how bad they are at security.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I am a software developer who does custom EMR software specifically because the places I work for can’t use the cloud. But okay I will try…

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No I can’t cite something that doesn’t exist. I literally just said there isn’t one… so I am not sure what your point is.

        • wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Legally, any organization that used this service would be opening themselves to further liability under HIPAA.

          What legal violation? Because the law says nothing about that.

          what the law does allow, is data storage with a BAA.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            What?!? The entire purpose of HIPAA is to put liability on misuse of data. At this point, I have no fucking clue what your point is.

            • wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yes, but you talked about how cloud storage vs on prem is a violation.

              Put up or shut up.

              Also see my edit about a BAA

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                The answer to your question is in the article you posted… did you even read it?

                Have a great day, I’m done talking in circles.

                  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    Believe it or not I pay attention to usernames. I was talking about the link you just posted that mentions the liability assumed by the signers of the BAA.

                    Maybe read it again? My job requires me to be HIPAA and FERPA certified, I am confident in my interpretation of the situation.

            • wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Fun fact, the law actually does not lay out a single technical “must do”.

              But rather establish liabilities and defines miss use. Which is NOT the same as proper use.