You must log in or # to comment.
OP image is from 2023, Microsoft have spent wayyyyyy more on AI now.
And the answers are now much better - they’re erudite and wrong in-depth, instead of just plain-old, boring wrong.
It’s a wrong answer coupled with “show your work”. So not only is it wrong, it will also explain in detail how wrong it is.
I mean I don’t see why you couldn’t put Chihuahua meat in the microwave. Now it’s not how I would cook my chihuahua meat but still.
We will end up bailing out these big corporations running this ai bullshit with borrowed tax dollars. Before we max out our credit.
Between that, the energy crisis, and the cost of creating said energy crisis, I wonder how long before there’s an entire collapse of American society through economic apocalypse
AI don’t know half of the prompts half as well as it should; and it knows less than half of the prompts half as well as you deserve.
2 out of 4 correct
Wait isn’t only one correct? Technically you can put chihuahua meat in the microwave, but the others are wrong right? It’s not safe to drink and drive, not safe to drink battery acid, and you can eat peanuts if you’re not allergic
doesn’t say anything about it being safe to drink battery acid
yup, it says “can” not “should”
Guess it doesn’t. Good point
Given that they’re yes/no answers, that’s not great lol
chihuahua yes hamster no that makes nurse edna cry
The 3 sources are all Florida Men™
That last example is at least technically correct.
No, because it would curdle, so it’s more eat than drink
It’s just sad and desperate when you have to use edge cases from 3 years ago to make your point.
There’s no way to “fix” llms is the problem. This is inherent to how the tech works.
Yes I’m aware that LLM nor search has been completely reliable. Yet I persist with intervention and common sense.
I tried the last one and it still worked for me
👌👍 even sadder when you get to straight up lying
It amazes me how people will go out of their way to defend “gen” AI and LLMs, especially on a decentralized platform that aims to divert power away from the wealthy and their proprietary platforms. Does the boot taste that good?
The edge cases include people killing themselves after chatting with these bots, the edge cases matter.
You’ve conflated many topics.
You can understand the usefulness of the models while also imagining to introduce those in control to a very special kind of Luigi drone powered by said AI.
Screeching about edge cases when the general public finds it useful and engaging is a good way to make sure that person ignores you and is further resistant to change.
Not the same prompt, not the current UI or how they are presented. I’m guessing the best part here is you used some model with outdated data in some silly attempt to win internet karma. These things are really validated my man.
You realize you’re just making yourself noise to anyone who might actually want to learn on the topic right? You hurt your own community with these
Not the same prompt
You’re right about that, my mistake
not the current UI or how they are presented
You are lying or a bot. I literally took this screenshot on bing.com today, like OOP
deleted by creator
