Yes, obviously AI is emitting way too much. It shouldn’t even be producing 0.2% of global emissions, let alone 2%. My main grievance is that no one ever talks about improving industrial and agricultural processes even though they produce around 29% of emissions and 20% of emissions respectively.

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    first, this relies on poore nemecek 2018, which used poor methodology, so you shouldn’t believe the study you cited.

    but beyond that, much of that farmland is grazing land. that’s not 80% of agriculture, it’s 80% of agricultural land.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Yeah agricultural land was what I tried to convey as well, fixed thanks (not necessarily land that is agriculturable for human edible produce though).

      Here are some other sources:

      %71

      %85

      %85

      %70-75

        • Avicenna@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Potentially yes but I think if it is always the same type then it deprived the land of certain types of nutrients. You need to rotate the crops.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            if you’re planting crops, sure. if you’re grazing grasslands, the story changes, and that’s most of what agricultural lands used for animals are.